Could Comer pass a background check? I doubt it. What encompasses a background check? Was the person on antidepressants? Or the person is not who they claim to be? Comer is a pissant like most of them. In the past, he was dismissive of Trump's disgusting background so I question him on the ability to assess anyone. Granted I am sure there are loons out there who want to testify. Culling through whistleblowers must be very taxing work. Not.
I don't trust any of the politicians because only a small percentage of them do good for the sake of doing good. Their motivations are steeped in self-serving agendas. I trust Mark Warner. I trust Jon Ossoff. That's it.
I'm just coming across this piece. There's no indication that the proposed witnesses were military personnel. Jeremy Corbell stated in August that he and George Knapp were supposed to speak as witnesses at the hearing.
In a discussion about Matt’s article and Comer’s “failed background checks“, ‘Science Bob McGwier’ - himself ex-military, Virginia Tech and rubs shoulders with the in-crowd (he saw Grusch last year at SCU) said this In response:
“..Well, let me tell you what that means - It means 5% of the people who are retired and now ready to talk, they went off and got drunk and they wrecked their car or whatever.. they cheated on their taxes whatever - that doesn’t mean what they say isn’t true. It means they can’t be read back in so they can talk about what they know - because it’s classified. If they don’t have a clearance they can’t even talk about it. If they’ve gotten drunk and run into a tree or they’ve committed a felony etc., they’re not gonna be cleared so they can’t talk about what they know legally..”
I do not understand the comments regarding security background checks. It doesn't make sense. If the witnesses pass their yearly security clearance reviews and currently hold an active clearance they should be good to go.
I wonder what it was that made some of the Witnesses Disqualified ?
It is DEFINITELY better to have Credible witnesses that have Clean Backgrounds.
We don't want to take any chances at this point, because we are SO. CLOSE to getting some REAL witness Disclosure !
It may be getting political?
Does this mean the UFO whistleblowers will be cross-examined by ‘Moms for Liberty’?
Could Comer pass a background check? I doubt it. What encompasses a background check? Was the person on antidepressants? Or the person is not who they claim to be? Comer is a pissant like most of them. In the past, he was dismissive of Trump's disgusting background so I question him on the ability to assess anyone. Granted I am sure there are loons out there who want to testify. Culling through whistleblowers must be very taxing work. Not.
I don't trust any of the politicians because only a small percentage of them do good for the sake of doing good. Their motivations are steeped in self-serving agendas. I trust Mark Warner. I trust Jon Ossoff. That's it.
I'm just coming across this piece. There's no indication that the proposed witnesses were military personnel. Jeremy Corbell stated in August that he and George Knapp were supposed to speak as witnesses at the hearing.
"There were five witnesses there for the hearing. George (Knapp) and I were supposed to talk initially." — TalkTV, August 9, 2023 https://youtu.be/1_2A7dCUeLg?si=oVvgRD6mOIKfgR_O&t=842
I'd like to know from Comer or Burchett if it was Corbell and Knapp that failed the background checks.
In a discussion about Matt’s article and Comer’s “failed background checks“, ‘Science Bob McGwier’ - himself ex-military, Virginia Tech and rubs shoulders with the in-crowd (he saw Grusch last year at SCU) said this In response:
“..Well, let me tell you what that means - It means 5% of the people who are retired and now ready to talk, they went off and got drunk and they wrecked their car or whatever.. they cheated on their taxes whatever - that doesn’t mean what they say isn’t true. It means they can’t be read back in so they can talk about what they know - because it’s classified. If they don’t have a clearance they can’t even talk about it. If they’ve gotten drunk and run into a tree or they’ve committed a felony etc., they’re not gonna be cleared so they can’t talk about what they know legally..”
- At 51:43, on the ‘Spaced Out Radio’ podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/spaced-out-radio/id1151217170?i=1000618948202
Science Bob on Twitter: https://twitter.com/BobMcGwier_N4HY
I do not understand the comments regarding security background checks. It doesn't make sense. If the witnesses pass their yearly security clearance reviews and currently hold an active clearance they should be good to go.
Luna was a stripper before conning trump supporters into electing her & now she’s some kind of expert on congressional witnesses 🤣
Republicans are a shitshow of incompetence