Nov 30, 2023·edited Nov 30, 2023Liked by Matt Laslo
Schumer's amendment is AIRTIGHT. Burchett and Gaetz's amendment is a joke - it once again excuses disclosure of things that might affect national security.
The DOD will just say "we don't have anything to disclose that won't endanger national security"
It also does not specify materials recovered by the various intelligence agencies-specifically the CIA, which is extremely relevant given the recent revelations.
Schumer’s UAP Amendment Version IS THE BEST VERSION WE HAVE SO FAR. Grusch helped craft it.
Burchett’s/Gaetz’s proposed UAP amendment, if you have seen it, will not accomplish anything.
Schumer's amendment is AIRTIGHT. Burchett and Gaetz's amendment is a joke - it once again excuses disclosure of things that might affect national security.
The DOD will just say "we don't have anything to disclose that won't endanger national security"
It also does not specify materials recovered by the various intelligence agencies-specifically the CIA, which is extremely relevant given the recent revelations.
So does anyone know yet whether this is competing with the UAPDA or just in addition to it? If it's the former, it would be a huge mistake.
You crazy son of a bitch, you did it again!
hahahaha
I understand that it’s in place of it.